News Framing and Critical Discourse Analysis of Diplomatic Pressure and Governance Narrative on Nigeria as Country of Particular Concern (2020-2026)

Authors

  • Saman Indo Polycarp Information and Protocol Department, Federal University, Wukari PG Student, Department of Mass Communication, Kwararafa University, Wukari Author
  • Peter I. Ugondo Department of Mass Communication, Taraba State University, Jalingo Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22913458

Keywords:

News framing, diplomatic pressure, Country of Particular Concern, Nigeria

Abstract

This study examines the news framing of diplomatic pressure and governance narratives surrounding Nigeria's designation as a Country of Particular Concern (CPC) under the International Religious Freedom Act from 2020 to 2025. The designation, which signaled U.S. concern about religious freedom violations in Nigeria, generated significant diplomatic tension between Nigeria and the United States and intense media coverage within Nigeria. The study employs a mixed-methods research design combining quantitative content analysis of 347 newspaper articles and 487 tweets from X and qualitative critical discourse analysis, situated within framing, agenda-setting theory, and propaganda model. The findings reveal four dominant frames in Nigerian media coverage: Sovereignty Violation (40.1%), Religious Victimization (28.0%), Counter-Terrorism (20.7%), and Geopolitical Competition (11.2%). Outlet type significantly predicted framing, with government-aligned outlets (Daily Trust and The Sun) favoring the Sovereignty Violation Frame (56.0%), while independent outlets (The Guardian and Vanguard) favoring the Religious Victimization Frame (37.6%). Nigerian Government Officials were the most frequently cited sources (23.6%), while USCIRF/U.S. officials accounted for only 10.6% of citations. Framing evolved over time, with the Sovereignty Violation Frame declining from 52.2% in 2020 to 31.5% in 2025, while the Religious Victimization and Counter-Terrorism frames increased. Digital media discourse on X was more polarized than mainstream media, with higher engagement for the Religious Victimization Frame. The study concludes that Nigerian media actively construct competing frames reflecting deeper tensions between anti-colonial nationalism and human rights advocacy. It recommends enhanced sourcing diversity, frame awareness training for journalists, and proactive diplomatic communication strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-23