Assessing the Effectiveness of Change Management Strategies in Managing Organizational Transformation: A Comparative Analysis

Authors

  • Chibuzo Christian Ohagwa Department of Human Resource Management, Peaceland University, Nigeria. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21702832

Keywords:

change management, organizational transformation, change strategies, leadership support, resistance to change, organizational development, ADKAR model, Kotter’s model, Lewin’s change theory, transformation success

Abstract

Organizational transformation has become unavoidable for companies navigating rapid technological, economic, and cultural shifts. While change is constant, successfully managing it remains one of the biggest challenges organizations face. This paper examines how different change management strategies influence the success of organizational transformation, using a comparative lens to highlight what works, what fails, and why. By reviewing major change models such as Lewin’s Change Model, Kotter’s 8-Step Process, ADKAR, the McKinsey 7-S Framework, and Agile-based approaches, the study identifies the strengths and limitations each strategy brings to the transformation process.

The paper also explores the critical roles of leadership, communication, employee involvement, and organizational culture—factors that consistently shape whether a change initiative succeeds or collapses. While no single change strategy fits every situation, the review shows that organizations that combine structured frameworks with flexible, people-centered practices achieve better outcomes. The study ultimately provides practical insights for leaders, managers, and stakeholders seeking to navigate complex transitions and build more resilient organizations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-30

How to Cite

Assessing the Effectiveness of Change Management Strategies in Managing Organizational Transformation: A Comparative Analysis. (2026). Journal of Education, Communication, and Digital Humanities, 4(2), 593-606. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21702832